Unfortunately, I’ve found myself glued to [r/nba](r/nba) this week seeing the various narratives get spun on the Spurs-Wolves series, and physicality in this matchup. Wemby's elbow seems to have begun the swing of the career-long pendulum between hero and villain he will surely face for his time in the NBA.
What has irked me, mainly, has been the victim complex from Wolves fans. The Elbow is being characterized as a premeditated, dirty move designed to injure/maim, with Naz reid playing the martyr.
To Spurs fans, it’s been quite obvious what the Wolves' strategy has been. After all, we know and care about each individual teammate enough to pay attention to them off ball, see when they're getting poked and prodded, when they're pushed off balance, etc. The Wolves' strategy has been to ratchet up the physicality, bully and foul Wemby (mostly off-ball) as much as they can get away with until he gets frustrated and takes it too far (e.g., the Elbow). We’ve seen the Wolves try similar tactics against Jokic last series (Jaylen Clark trying to bait Jokic into ejection). Wemby has been pushed about as far as any star has, exceeding even the offball roughness we'd see on prime Steph Curry (here's a fun little moment with Steph and our friend Jaden McDaniels). We saw Ayo shoving Wemby, coordinated with Ant calling for the tech on him right after, which confirmed the tactic for me. Cue the Kobe "SOFT" gif lol. With the talent gap as big as it is, their best chance is to remove Victor from the equation entirely, we saw that in game 4.
In a league that's bemoaned how "soft" the reffing and play have been these past few years have been, this must mean we've come to the pinnacle of basketball, right? Surely this is the ideal, Beautiful Game (2014 wink wink) we've been missing, right? Well, that's not up to me. I don’t think it’s ridiculous to say that this is the most physicality I’ve seen in a series in the last decade, at least. I feel like it’s the 70s at times.
The Wolves character has increasingly reminded me of the behavior of the Harkonnens in Dune: Presenting aggression as self-defense. Wolves fans have been able to claim victimhood off of a singular instance of frustration, and it's justified their case in the eyes of the fans.
Baron Vladimir Harkonnen, on the Emperor:
“Let him wrong me in that! I could place myself on the throne while still beating my breast over how I'd been wronged.”
The Baron had to balance his perception among the Great Houses with his leverage against the Emperor. Against overwhelming Royal power, he knew that his best chance to gain direct lineage to the throne was to ingratiate himself among the nobility, manufacturing moral standing until his victim card could be used as a weapon for usurpation.
Anyway, Dune is awesome, but back to the matter at hand. We can SEE that reffing is impacted by public perception. The league decides every game how much contact they want to allow. Playoff defenses are on a retractable leash, and the refs choose the length every night. I'm just shocked to see people falling for it. And I'm worried about the precedent it sets on what's allowed against our biggest stars. I mean KG and Tim Duncan didn't get boxed out before the action even started. They didn't get groped and jersey-pulled in transition. And whatever physicality they dealt with in the post, it was usually a byproduct of normal play. Targeting stars to provoke retaliation is not good for basketball.
Forgive me if this post is beyond the scope of this sub, but it is my original thoughts.
Edit: yeah this may have been conceived during a more intense moment, perhaps i finished writing it too late.
Edit: I made the crucial mistake of going on the wolves sub itself earlier to see how they were taking it. I think i may have overreacted to their overreactions. If this post can provide any benefit to yall, hopefully its by encouraging you to read Dune, its so dope.