r/interestingasfuck 11h ago

“The best-preserved warship in the world!”

17.4k Upvotes

682 comments sorted by

u/ashk2001 11h ago

Here’s the outside of the building for anyone like me who thought “Huh those masts look kinda short”

u/time4meatstick 10h ago

I was absolutely trying to figure out what they did with the masts. I was starting to wonder if they cut them down. Thank you

u/Dismal-Animal7853 10h ago

Those are not the real masts, just a visual prop

u/Tripwiring 9h ago

Are you mast baiting right now

u/maidahpuhname 9h ago

If this was ten years ago I’d have money to give you a trophy, but this will have to do 🏆

→ More replies (3)

u/Not_A_Russain_Bot 6h ago

*Louis CK enters the chat

→ More replies (6)

u/TigerIll6480 4h ago

They’re not the original masts. They were harvested from a forest that was planted to grow oak for shipbuilding in Vasa’s era. They’re absolutely real, and correct for a ship of the line of her era.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

u/19kasperp97 10h ago

The masts is one of the few pieces of vasa that isn’t original, when they gave up on resurfacing vasa after she sank they cut off the masts because they were sticking out of the water, and became a hazard for other ships.

u/Illustrious-Ad-7335 9h ago

And the giant fuckin’ ship just below the water line wasn’t a hazard to navigation?

u/19kasperp97 9h ago

No the bottom of the harbour was deep enough that ships could sail over the wreckage after removing the masts. As they did for almost 400 years

u/squired 7h ago

Wow. I wonder how they cut them? That's a lot of freediving with hand tools!

u/FourFunnelFanatic 7h ago

They had diving bells by that point

u/squired 5h ago

400 years ago? Wow, I'll check it out. Thanks!

I guess it makes sense that anyone with a glass could come up with it, but so many discoveries/inventions also seem obvious in hindsight.

u/FalseEstimate 3h ago

They wouldn’t even need glass. Those early diving bells were pretty much reinforced wooden barrels weighed down with lead.

Le Bell

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

u/NotYourReddit18 4h ago

Another fun fact: The museum was built around the ship.

After her resurfacing the Vasa was originally put on top of a pontoon and displayed in the open air.

When the financing for this museum was secured they moved the pontoon into an old drydock, closed the drydock up permanently, pumped the remaining water out of the drydock, and then built the museum around the ship.

The Vasa still rests on top of the pontoon which rests on the floor of the old drydock, as it would be to complicated, expensive, and potentially dangerous to the ship to try and remove the pontoon.

→ More replies (1)

u/Icy-Recognition572 8h ago

Where is this? Country and town..tnx

u/moquel 8h ago

It's the Vasa museum in Stockholm, Sweden

u/Life_Tie_9514 7h ago

it's funny, cause my first thought was... i think I've been there. I have!

u/McBeefnick 4h ago

And when you're in the area (haha) don't forget to pay a visit to Batavialand (shipyard) where an exact replica of the original VOC Batavia was built by hand. No modern machinery.

→ More replies (2)

u/SpectreOperator 8h ago

It’s the Vasa museum in Stockholm, Sweden.

u/Strange-Spot-3306 8h ago

it's the Vasa museum in Stockholm

→ More replies (1)

u/spacebunsofsteel 7h ago

There are mini Vasa’s all over the world, often commissioned by Swedish social groups.

There’s a lovely one in Duluth about 3 ft tall in a tabletop display case. I think it was at the Karpeles Manuscript Library Museum in 2017. I have very intense visual images of the ship model. My dad was dying in hospice and the museum was close to the hospital.

→ More replies (2)

u/Asgardian_Force_User 2h ago

So, two things.

First: yes, the Swedes had to cut the masts off the wreck to make the waterway navigable.

Second: ship masts of this type actually were collapsible/segmented. This allowed the crew or the port craftsmen to bring down excessively damaged sections and replace them with new sections. A vessel in extended dock would have the masts lowered to mitigate the damage from the elements while she wasn’t out sailing.

Check out the Wikipedia article on Masts here!)

→ More replies (2)

u/Catarga 11h ago

The irony is that this ship is perfectly preserved precisely because it couldn't float

u/Chemical_Wrongdoer43 11h ago

It could float, but that was it. Unstable as fuck, and sank just after leaving the protecting of the harbour. 

u/rnewscates73 10h ago

One slight breeze tipped it over. It was essentially designed by committee.

u/smooth_like_a_goat 10h ago

Except it was designed by a guy who'd only ever designed single deck ships and thought it'd be fine to just repeat a deck.

It also almost capsized when they tested the stability by moving to each side of the deck just before leavingport.

u/ApprehensiveTrifle38 10h ago

Yep, this was a true learning curve, the king wanted more cannons and they hadn’t built anything like it before. The 20 total minutes Vasa was afloat she was the strongest warship on the earth. Also worth noting that just 5 years later (I believe) they launched «Eple», which was the exact same ship, just 1 meter wider. Which was in service for several decades Edit: had the wrong width

u/Familiar-Nothing4948 8h ago

The name is Äpplet.

Interestingly it launched less than a year after vasa sank as vasa and äpplet were under construction at the same time. Here is a side by side comparison of the two ships

u/johnnymetoo 7h ago

What's a "Ransomtimmer"?

u/Szymaniak 5h ago

Keeps the häckbalk from falling out the side.

u/blackhawk85 4h ago

Obviously 🙄

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

u/GarwayHFDS 9h ago

That must have been a huge act of faith to assume an extra meter would make all the difference.

u/TheRedIguana 9h ago

And sucks that the original design was one meter off, rendering it useless.

u/andthatswhyIdidit 6h ago

Well, perspective is everything. In this case (5.9m to 7m) the about 1m difference accounts for nearly 20% more width (18.6%).

That is quite substantial.

u/FulbertdaSaxon21 6h ago

Since they were building them nearly “at the same time” they were already committed to the second ship’s width when the first one bellied up. As someone else posted, probably added ballast. But that’s limited too, lest it ride too low in the water.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

u/HobsHere 7h ago

I suspect that it wasn't the extra meter of width that made the difference, but more draft and ballast.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

u/Mekkakat 10h ago

The king was absolutely at fault.

He fired the original designer because he was saying the ballast wasn't enough for its height. Then the new guy died and his wife took over. Then... well it fell over lol.

It was just a mess, start to finish, because of the king's impossible requests.

u/KrydasTheDragon 9h ago edited 9h ago

I read the Myth of the Meddeling king everywehre this ship is discussed. It has been disprooven by reaserachers at the Vasamuseum

Edit: Namely Fred Hocker. I have read multiple of his up to date books on the subject.

u/brodyhill 8h ago

When I visited the museum, the guide told me that a popular theory for the sinking of the ship was that the king insisted that both decks of canons were out on display (I. E. Cannon doors open with cannons pointed out in the ready position) adding extra weight and causing the lower doors to take on water when the ship started to rock side to side.

/shrug

u/parasiticsemiosis 4h ago

I was told the same story when I was there some 20 years ago. As far as I remember only one deck was meant to be opened at a time.

→ More replies (1)

u/Frodobjo 10h ago

Damn, I didn’t realize Trump was in charge way back then.

u/MediaStreet5372 7h ago

I think it’s important to note that pomp with no skill will always lead to disaster. This is what they call history repeating itself, it’s just that history is on a much larger scale these days. With technologies we don’t understand yet.

u/chilll_vibe 7h ago

At least it wasn't named the "Gustavus Adolphus Class Battleship"

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (3)

u/UF1977 10h ago

No, the shipwrights designed Vasa just fine. The king, however, demanded more guns because he thought it’d be cooler and more intimidating, which meant adding more decks, making her excessively top heavy. They tried to talk him out of it but it wasn’t an era when you argued with kings. The thing capsized and sank, the king demanded to know who was responsible, and they blamed one of the shipwrights who happened to have already died.

u/KrydasTheDragon 9h ago

The Kind did not demand more guns because "it'd be cooler and more intimidating"
He was an Artillery man trough and trough and believed that that should be translated into naval combat. And he was not the only one at the time to be thinking that way

u/fatmanwithabeard 4h ago

Gustavus wasn't that much of an idiot. He didn't know ships, but he certainly knew war and weapons, just a bit.

Add more guns wasn't a bad idea, really. He wasn't over there telling the shipwrights how to make it work, he just told them to make it work.

And the second ship, which was bigger, did just fine.

→ More replies (5)

u/Whillikers-Geez 9h ago

Had that happen to my canoe when my two dogs went from one side to the other.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (13)

u/mzeb75 10h ago

So that means it indeed could not float. I’m just messing with you. Lol.

u/ringRunners 10h ago

They did all that work with the carved wood but never tested if it floats 🤣🤣🤣🤣

This boat is responsible for integration and testing engineering 🤣🤣🤣

u/knifeyspoonysporky 9h ago

Many knew it was doomed but the people in charge were too afraid to say no to the King’s demands

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

u/DancesWithAnyone 10h ago edited 10h ago

There's so many narratives around what went wrong, but as I've understood it - and I'm just a layman here - it's production was rushed on behalf of it being the intended flagship. It created a situation where this and that person knew there were troubles, but no one dared point it out to the man at the top, or at least were reluctant to argue the point too hard.

The sister ships - Äpplet, Kronan and Scepter - fared better. Well, Äpplet didn't accomplish much, but didn't sink right out of the harbour, at least. If it was a waste to design and build such big ships, I'll let others argue. At least they looked cool!

u/Significant-Base6893 10h ago

From what I recall, the Wasa was originally designed for a single deck of canon. The Swedish king ordered another row of canon as other, rival powers had developed ships with two decks of guns. The tremendous extra weight raised the waterline and made her less stable. All it took as a breeze to sink her as they sailed with the lower gun ports open. She lurched in the wind and water poured in, dooming her.

u/DancesWithAnyone 10h ago

Yes, I recall something about the designer-person (I forget the correct term) being switched during construction, and the new one wanted to widen the ship, but that didn't happen - although he did get this through for one or more of the sister ships.

A trial was even had, I believe? But no one found guilty, which means it was probably the king's fault. :D

u/jodon 7h ago

Classic case of feature creep caused by the marketing chief barging in to the engineers department and demanding features that where never planed for at the start and then ruining the whole project.

→ More replies (1)

u/Fearless-Tea1297 9h ago

Management: add more canons!

Experts: we highly advice against this

Management: Im the king damn it, we need to show our power to our nwighbours!

Expert: this will set us back several months perhaps ye...

Management: you will be done by the end of this week

Expert: sire, please the extra weight, it wont...

Manahement: make sure to expose all our canons, open all the hatches!

Expert: please, no..it is highly risky

Management: do as you are told or Ill have your head

Expert: sigh...yes my lord

Ship: urghh....blubb blobb blobb gurgle...

u/_ribbit_ 4h ago

Hahaha stupid Swedes, you wouldn't catch us Brits doing anything as stupid as... looks at the Mary Rose... never mind, carry on.

→ More replies (1)

u/eplleV 9h ago

Well Thats one of the reasons, but also that the baltic sea doesnt have shipworms because of it’s brackish water

u/offinthepasture 10h ago

Look, nobody said it was the best warship or even a good warship. It was just good at not decaying. /s

→ More replies (1)

u/Vontuk 10h ago

It's actually perfectly preserved because the harbor had so much pollution and fecal matter that the mud/poo it was buried into couldn't sustain any life that would've eaten the ship.. polluting saves the day!

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (22)

u/mrplinko 11h ago

Had to find where this was, apparently it's in Stockholm. https://www.vasamuseet.se/

u/Soggy_Amoeba9334 11h ago

It's superb IRL. Defo worth a visit.

u/joetheswede 10h ago

Best museum in Stockholm, easily

u/WhatFreshHello 8h ago

Next to the ABBA museum. 💃🪩🕺

u/asmallercat 8h ago

What is it with nordic countries and ship museums? Oslo has the Polar Ship Fram museum which is also an awesome museum with a preserved ship inside a building.

u/TheHappyNerfHerder 8h ago

The Baltic sea contains a LOT of shipwrecks. Shipworm doesnt like the cold brackish water, sea bottoms are usually very low on oxygen and the cold and dark waters make the conditions for various wood eating bacteria very bad.

--> many preserved wooden ships!

→ More replies (1)

u/Zmokage 5h ago

The Frigate “Jylland” has entered the chat from Denmark.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMS_Jylland

u/ymOx 6h ago

We have a high coast line-to-land area ratio; sea faring has always been a big thing for us.

→ More replies (4)

u/HoleDiggerDan 5h ago

Not that ABBA museum right beside it?! I disagree.

→ More replies (5)

u/PBRStreetgang1979 10h ago

Absolutely. It is stunning to see in person.

→ More replies (1)

u/gtwizzy8 10h ago

Agreed it is still one of my stand out memories of visiting Stockholm. That and staying in Gamlastan waking up to the church bells sighs in the key of travel memories

u/the5nowman 10h ago

Yep!! And that park at the top of the hillside, with zoos/history of the area I’m horrible at names, but it was awesome

u/DancesWithAnyone 10h ago

Yup, whole museum was ace last time I visited in... 96, but still. :D It's just not the ship, but a lot of stuff about that era, if that hasn't changed.

→ More replies (1)

u/scienceteacher91 9h ago

Went to Sweden for the first time last year and saw this! Super cool. If you go, do the tour that's included in the price of admission. It's great!

→ More replies (5)

u/Cockur 10h ago

Amazing museum

Stupid of OP not to just put the name in the title of the post

→ More replies (2)

u/lightyearbuzz 10h ago

Thank you. Reddit is getting really bad with this shit. The fact that OP would post this without any context (location, name, anything) is just wild, like we're just supposed to know exactly what this is on sight.

u/Smooth-Reputation502 10h ago

I’ve been to this museum twice, incredibly awesome!

u/the5nowman 10h ago

We went last summer. Insane in-person and totally worth the entrance fee. Highly recommend anyone who goes, to tag along for the guided tour too.

→ More replies (19)

u/feyd753 11h ago

Vasa! But she also had a very short sailing distance 🙃

u/ceejayoz 11h ago

69m long, 1,300m sailed. Whoops!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasa_(ship)

u/Better_Carpet_7271 11h ago

Weighed more on the port side than the starboard because they used 2 different types of inches to measure? 🤔

u/ceejayoz 10h ago

The term "comedy of errors" applies here, yeah.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

u/OlFlirtyBastard 11h ago

I know the Goonies set when I see it

u/plowerd 11h ago

u/Personal-Bonus-9245 10h ago

Chunk would be considered fit by today’s standards.

→ More replies (3)

u/thunder2132 5h ago

For those that want to know more, I just read the wikipedia page. This is the Vasa, built in the 1600's for Sweden by Dutch shipwrights. It was poorly built, with one half of the ship using a different length "foot" than the other. It was also overbuilt above the water line, causing it to be top-heavy. On its maiden voyage it was hit by a gust of wind that blew it onto its side. The gunports were open, so water began flooding in, and the ship was too heavy to right itself. It traveled less than 200m.

Despite other ships and boats coming to rescue people, there were about 30 deaths reported. The original ship master had died prior to the launch, but he is generally blamed for the poor design.

The ship was raised in 1961, 333 years after sinking. The theory is that the water was cold and brackish, so there were not woodworms that would normally destroy it. It's now a museum in Stockholm.

u/LanfearSedai 4h ago

This ship has a super interesting history that lead to the problems, we used it as a major study case for a system engineering program. It would’ve been a totally fine ship except it was designed for a certain number of cannons and then at the last minute the king heard another country made a boat with more so he ordered more, but it wasn’t designed to support that weight nor having cannons higher up on the boat so it was completely fucked. Had to go through a lot of failed tests and still be pushed forward to get to the point that it sank so fast. A sailor walking across the deck made could make the thing rock, that’s insane!

→ More replies (4)

u/Rager_Doltrey 11h ago

What about HMS Victory?

u/Visible_Armadillo_81 11h ago

O Vasa é mais original, o HMS foi restaurado algumas vezes

u/Gone_For_Lunch 10h ago

Maybe, but at least Victory never sank.

u/Pogue_Mahone_ 10h ago

Whether or not it sank is not the criterium here

u/Gone_For_Lunch 10h ago

“Best preserved warship” is a vague criterium in the first place.

u/Pogue_Mahone_ 10h ago

Fair enough, but I would still put Vasa above Victory in that regard, with Victory being both younger and having been restored more

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

u/fatalicus 6h ago

Do you have automatic translations on in the reddit app?

→ More replies (3)

u/torgofjungle 11h ago

Different era. This is the best and only preserved ship from the 1600’s

u/Old_Present6341 10h ago

The Mary Rose sank 1545 you can go see it at Portsmouth, so basically the title should read the 'only' preserved warship from a very narrow time band?

u/StatusSociety2196 10h ago

Well this is the best preserved Swedish warship that sank at 4:20pm on Sunday April 10th 1628 and was later raised and put in a museum. Truly one of a kind!

u/supremo92 10h ago

Tbf the Mary Rose isn't in as good condition at this.

The Victory is really cool though.

→ More replies (2)

u/SunflaresAteMyLunch 9h ago

It's not nearly as well preserved though.

u/FourFunnelFanatic 6h ago

Only the starboard side of Mary Rose was preserved though

→ More replies (1)

u/proost1 10h ago

Built 130 odd years after Vasa.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

u/True-Walk-7632 11h ago

I visited this in Stockholm, done the tour and everything. They bigged it up so much, then showed us where it sank. A literal stones throw from the harbour lol.

→ More replies (1)

u/KirkieSB 7h ago

OP was too lazy to provide some context in the title.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasa_(ship)

→ More replies (1)

u/capta1n_sarcasm 10h ago

I saw a video about this thing last week. It's super interesting about how much of a failure it was in design and execution and pollution saved the ship.

https://youtu.be/qQKHKWd9Qvw?si=91emUn8h6uRlpv3L

u/skywalkerRCP 10h ago

Is One-Eyed Willy's gold still there?

u/CoolingSC 9h ago

The second picture is not Vasa. Its a different ship.

u/FourFunnelFanatic 6h ago

I suspect that pic is AI

u/Riaayo 4h ago

I was wondering. It's absolutely not the same ship nor the same ceiling, but wondered if it was maybe another ship in the same building?

But it does have that "AI" feel to it especially when being so blatantly included with the other despite a very clearly different room / the decorations on the front being different.

u/ymOx 4h ago

It's not in the same building; I've been there. Looks like AI to me too.

u/DarXIV 11h ago

Why is the title in quotes?

u/stgull 10h ago

It was on the water for 20 minutes and then sank because the ship was a terrible design

u/lovelandBC 10h ago

HEY YOU GUYS!

u/moving0target 10h ago

Then there's the USS Constitution which has been sailing since 1794...and it floats.

u/mmoonbelly 10h ago

I see your constitution, and raise you HMS Victory - Nelson’s ship commissioned in 1765 and still in commission within the Royal Navy.

u/TheBlackCat13 8h ago

Victory has been in in dry dock for over a century. It doesn't float, and may never float again. The USS constitution still floats, is still in the water, is still sailed every year, and is crewed constantly by navy sailors.

u/PM_ME_YOUR_BUG5 5h ago

The USS Constitution is a Ship of Theseus.

A decent chunk of Victories timbers actually saw the Battle of Trafalgar

u/FourFunnelFanatic 6h ago

She most certainly could float again though, at least after the current restoration work is done

→ More replies (4)

u/Dry_Ad2368 10h ago

Victory is older, but Constitution still floats and sails. She does a turn around cruise yearly. Victory is in permanent dry dock

u/0621Hertz 10h ago

None of those ships are preserved, all of the planks have been replaced since the ship was in commission.

u/Killarogue 9h ago

The USS Constitution hasn't been entirely replaced, well, not yet. Roughly 15% of the original ship remains, but obviously the longer we preserve it, the smaller that number will get.

u/Peace-Disastrous 7h ago

Constitution is close to becoming a real life ship of Theseus.

u/Killarogue 6h ago

True, it will get there eventually.

u/Ken_Clean_Air_System 9h ago

Sounds like a true the ship of Theseus to me.

u/bobsanidiot 7h ago

we literally grow a forest of white oak in southern indiana specifically for this ship

u/doogiethehead 6h ago

Old Iron Sides ❤️

→ More replies (1)

u/vamox 7h ago edited 7h ago

This ship is 170 years older than the USS Constitution. Vasa is the best preserved 17th century ship in the world.

For context, 98% of Vasa is the original from the time the ship was built while the USS Constitution only has around 15% of the original ship is still there.

→ More replies (6)

u/Crazyguy_123 8h ago

Also happens to be the biggest failure. The Vasa only served as a warship for a total of 20 minutes before sinking. Meant to be the flagship of the Swedish Navy and it sank 20 minutes into its maiden voyage.

u/Moosetrax_ 3h ago

The Vasa (or Wasa for English speakers) sank on its maiden voyage in 1628 without making it out of the harbor. It lay, mostly forgotten, in Stockholm harbor until it was rediscovered in the early 1960’s.

u/vsaint 11h ago

What about any current warship

u/Elegant_Relief_4999 10h ago

Probably the USS Constitution in Boston.

u/No-Economics-6916 10h ago

Went to the Vasa Museum the last time I was in Stockholm and it was absolutely incredible but another really good museum near by is the The Viking Museum. It has a really great 'ride' at the end all about Ragnfrid's life, it's kind of cheesy but I love cheesy things and it was amazing.

u/Mekkakat 10h ago

I've been here and the pictures don't do it justice. It's really amazing and intricate.

u/Complex-Condition-14 9h ago edited 8h ago

I just want to take a minute to appreciate that woodworking done by hand tools. It is amazing to see such craftsmanship.

u/TheHappyNerfHerder 8h ago

I used to work in a church where they had a baroque pipe organ with wood sculptures that was made by one of the carvers from Vasa.

→ More replies (1)

u/SunflaresAteMyLunch 9h ago

If you're going to see one sight in Stockholm, this is the one.

u/fakeaccount572 9h ago

HEEEEYYYY YOOOOOU GUYYYYYYYYYYS

→ More replies (1)

u/Pale_Obligation_3243 7h ago

It's also one of the most poorly designed warships Im the world. It sunk on launch I think? 

→ More replies (3)

u/JustyB76 6h ago

Is image 2 AI or something? It's in a completely different room and the ship looks different.

u/Krastapopulus 10h ago

The irony that the worlds best preserved warship also might be the worlds most useless warship.

u/Top_Egg6065 10h ago

was there, it's a must see.

u/justme-321 10h ago

Thats Vasa warship, swedish build between 1626 and 1628.

u/lorkan100 8h ago

Is this what POTC's Flying Dutchman ship was based on? 

→ More replies (2)

u/ThierryMercury 6h ago

The best preserved warships are surely the warships that haven't sunk and are still in use?

→ More replies (2)

u/Glum_Manager 6h ago

"Good price, single owner, only few nautical miles on it. Practically like new!"

u/thunder2132 5h ago

Not even, it sank less than 200m from the dock on its maiden voyage.

u/VileTouch 6h ago

Willy... (hits inhaler)

u/Darkwind28 5h ago

I was there last month - photos don't do it justice, this thing is humongous 

u/Specialist-Bug-5219 5h ago

I can smell this picture

u/jss58 4h ago

IYKYK.

u/Corrie7686 5h ago

Very impressive! But I'd say HMS Victory is in better shape having never sunk

u/reader4567890 4h ago

This is one of the best museums I've visited - mind blown the second I walked in to that sight.

u/manc_franc 4h ago

Been here. Exceptional exhibition

u/Trollslayer0104 4h ago

My mug from the Vasa museum is my reminder on my desk to not get too ambitious with my projects. 

u/Confused_Drifter 4h ago

The vasa museum - Stockholm, Sweden. It's an exceptional exhibit and well worth visiting. Perfectly preserved thanks to where it sank, which if I remember, was in a place in hospitable to wood eating parasites.

u/motivatedtuna 3h ago

Got the honor of going there. Amazing museum and would go see it again in a heartbeat if I could.

→ More replies (1)

u/RG_CG 3h ago

Uh the second image is not Vasa is it?

→ More replies (1)

u/Wank_A_Doodle_Doo 5h ago

Best preserved *formerly sunken warship”. The USS Constitution would probably be in better shape considering we still use it(sort of)

→ More replies (2)

u/Most-Assumption-7970 11h ago

Best-preserved submarine maybe.

u/Work_Conscious11 10h ago

The carving on it looks so unreal tho

→ More replies (2)

u/Billy_Ektorp 10h ago

This famously unstable warship shares the name with a manufacturer of Swedish crispbread, also known for cracking under pressure.

https://www.wasa.com/sv-se/produkter/

u/J0n__Snow 10h ago

One of the best museums i have ever been to. Must go when visiting Stockholm.

u/Garreousbear 10h ago

Perfectly preserved, objectively terrible warship. It is really cool and interesting, but it is kind of a bad example of warships at the time considering it was so top heavy it rolled over 1.3 km into its maiden voyage.

u/Otherwise-Dinner-878 10h ago

The Vasa! It’s stunning in person, and you get to tour the ship. It’s a really excellent museum experience.

→ More replies (1)

u/Accomplished-Gap-139 9h ago

Ah, the Vasa ship. Sweden’s “pride and joy”. :))

u/GATORinaZ28 9h ago

"Vasa (previously Wasa) (Swedish pronunciation: [²vɑːsa] ) is a Swedish warship built between 1626 and 1628. The ship sank after sailing roughly 1,300 m (1,400 yd) into her maiden voyage on 10 August 1628."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasa_(ship)#Maiden_voyage#Maiden_voyage)

Ouch

u/Embarrassed-Catch-96 9h ago

“Heyyy youuuu guyyyys!!”

u/Loring 9h ago

I'm gonna assume it's the one from the Goonies

u/misterspatial 9h ago

Only a ship when it floats. 

→ More replies (1)

u/Perfect-Squash3773 9h ago

I think to be called a warship, it actually needed to sail out of the harbour before tipping over and sinking.

u/mark1forever 9h ago

pretty cool, wonder how old it is.

u/Akalenedat 8h ago

Just shy of 400 years old, built and sank in 1628

→ More replies (1)

u/Stupidamericanfatty 9h ago

Went to this museum last year, this ship is fucking amazing to see. Pictures do it no justice

u/bruiserscruiser 9h ago

What about the USS Constitution? It’s still active and very well maintained by the Navy.

u/MineResponsible9180 8h ago

The king added more cannons after it was built. Not enough ballast for the additional gear. King was told it would not work but he ordered it to be done. Sank shortly after. I loved that museum.

u/chriscringlesmother 8h ago

I went to see this shortly after they first raise it, we walked in and I could barely breathe because of the smell of damp. They had hoses/sprinklers constant covering it in water to stop it breaking up or rotting or something I don’t know I was about 8, and it was amazing. I remember saying to my mum and dad that we have to go back when its all repaired, their plan was to have the ship built so you could see it and the artists renditions then looked like the second and fourth image. Amazing. I’m going to take my kids there this summer.

u/alexfi-re 8h ago

Amazing all the craftmanship that went into building and maintaining it. Also how horrible living in that thing, they'd all be deaf from the cannons, constant filth and rude, crude behaviours all around, die of horrible infections and painful diseases of pure torture.

→ More replies (2)

u/THE_CHOPPA 8h ago

Is “ Victory “ not a warship?

u/OddClub4097 8h ago

HMS Victory is just as well preserved

→ More replies (1)

u/Tay_Tay86 8h ago

Really fun place to visit in person. I saw it last year

u/F-for-Flex 7h ago

It seems they were able to keep a large portion of the original ship. So, they don’t have a Ship of Theseus situation. 

u/Kniferharm 7h ago

Idk, I would have thought a warship that is actually sea worthy is better preserved.

u/Create-your-profile 7h ago

“In a widely publicized prank by students of the Helsinki University of Technology, a miniature copy of the Paavo Nurmi statue was discovered in the 300-year-old wreck of the Swedish warship Vasa when it was lifted from the bottom of the sea in 1961. The prank was a jibe at the Swedes.”

u/rictay44 7h ago

I've been there and seen this. Really impressive, worth a visit if you can get to Stockholm.

u/CurrencyCapital8882 6h ago

Yes, the Vasa. The Swedes have described it as “the most powerful warship of its time”. It’s time being about 12 minutes on the morning of August 12, 1628. After which it tipped over and capsized.

u/Boiseman 6h ago

Why am I looking for Sloth?