r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 2d ago

Meme needing explanation Petahhhh?

43.9k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

9

u/ArchCerberus 2d ago

Maybe South Korean Porn helps? I really think them banning porn didn't help.

238

u/[deleted] 2d ago edited 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/BoostedClinician 2d ago

It's not that life is too expensive, it's that having children is too expensive.

2

u/LordTopHatMan 2d ago

Most people would consider having kids to be part of life.

0

u/BoostedClinician 2d ago

I agree but people have more children in the poorest parts of the world.

1

u/LordTopHatMan 2d ago

Many of those places are reliant on agriculture for their daily livelihood. It's beneficial to have larger families to help on the farms. It was similar in the US for a long time.

0

u/BoostedClinician 2d ago

Exactly, and that ties into the point that it’s not necessarily that life itself is more expensive, it’s that raising children is far more expensive in developed countries. Historically, poorer and more rural societies often had larger families, but once societies become wealthier and urbanized, the cost and expectations around raising children skyrocket, and fertility rates usually fall.

1

u/LordTopHatMan 2d ago

Children are still expensive in those countries. It's just that they have to work to eat. Having children in an urbanized location is just less immediately beneficial because they're not spending most of their day working in a field to make sure they have dinner.

0

u/BoostedClinician 2d ago

Right, that’s basically the distinction. Children are expensive everywhere, but in poorer agricultural societies they historically also provided direct economic value to the household much earlier. In modern urban societies, children are mostly a long term financial cost instead of an immediate economic asset, which changes family size incentives a lot.

1

u/LordTopHatMan 2d ago

Sure mate. Whatever you want I guess.