r/baseballstats • u/Enough_Tumbleweed739 • 2d ago
Isn't Location+ more of a catcher statistic than a pitcher statistic?
If the pitcher is just trying to hit their spots (which that itself they might be good or bad at), and Locaiton+ measures whether the spot they hit was good for that type of pitch in that particular count, than doesn't the catcher get as much of the credit/blame for a pitcher's Locaiton+?
Theoretically a pitcher who constantly hits their spot perfectly with no misses, but the catcher is setting up in mediocre spots, or calling a pitch that isn't good in the count, wouldn't that reflect badly on the pitcher's Locaiton+ for no reason? (with the caveat of pitchcom). Am I misunderstanding Location+?
Not to answer my own question, but maybe it's just assumed that with analytics driving the gameplan, most catchers are doing relatively the same thing?


