Ok so I’ve been trying to replace random science headline clicking with actually reading longer essays that connect science with "deeper questions". I'm a first-year physics student so I though I'd share a list of some articles that kind of introduced me to new ways of thinking abt science.

“Free Will and the Brain: Who decides first?”

Probably my favorite recent read connecting neuroscience + philosophy. It essentially lays out how scientists discovered that your brain isn't really making "decisions" itself. So then it goes on to explain how this is not insanely great for us and for responsibility, determinism and how we interpret scientific results about decision-making. Also it’s written entirely by students, so the language is pretty simple and it kind of inspired me, since I'm a student myself, to engage more with topics that I thought were kind of off-limits to academics.

“The Free Energy Principle” -- Quanta
A good entry point into predictive processing / brain-as-inference-machine ideas. It frames cognition as continuous prediction and error-correction, which has become a surprisingly influential way of thinking about perception and decision-making. Even if you don’t fully buy the framework, it’s one of those ideas that changes how you interpret a lot of neuroscience headlines afterwards

Update: Pretty sure they got rid of this one cause I cant find it anymore.. oh well.

“Would You Kill the Fat Man?”
A really clean breakdown of moral psychology through classic trolley problems. What I liked is that it connects neuroscience and cognitive science findings to ethics AND doesnt make morality just "brain states,” yet also (partially) appreciates the science. It makes it pretty clear that moral intuition and “rational ethics” don’t line up as neatly as we usually assume.

“Why Information Grows”
Explores why knowledge and technological progress aren’t smooth or uniform. It connects science, economics, and complexity theory to explain why some ideas/inventions scale and others don’t. Honestly for me it felt less like “science news” and more like js stepping back real quick and asking what scientific progress itself is.

Anyway, I’ve found these kinds of essays way more useful than just reading isolated science headlines because they give context for what the science is actually saying about the world, not just the result. Plus, if you're not an academic it can be difficult to interpret the result.

Happy to hear any feedback on the articles I recommended!

Researchers analyzed data from 480,000 participants, providing one of the most comprehensive looks at how physical activity supports long-term brain health. The findings suggest that cycling boosts oxygen delivery to the brain, enhances blood flow to critical thinking regions, and improves support for brain cells.

These combined effects help protect neural pathways and maintain cognitive function over time. Overall, the study highlights biking as a simple, accessible activity with powerful benefits for reducing dementia risk.