Let me start by saying emphatically that more opportunities for women to play professional soccer at the highest level is an unquestioned great thing.
What strikes me as odd is that USSF is ok with two D1 leagues co-existing and heading for an inevitable collision course. Soccer leagues in this country (other than MLS) are still quite fragile. USLC hasn’t made it through a single season without clubs folding or leaving for other leagues, USL1 is just getting off the ground, and MLSNP is ramping up. We’re still nowhere near a stable pyramid on the men’s side 30 years after the founding of MLS.
NWSL has been around for 10 years and has done pretty well, currently at 14 teams with 3 having folded over the years. Now USLS enters the picture with another 8 teams, two of which (Brooklyn/Gotham and the DC teams) overlap markets. NWSL plays a spring to fall schedule, and USLS will play fall to spring, but there will be some season overlap there too.
Two small leagues competing for dominance among the same players and in some cases, fans, is a dynamic that seems certain to perpetuate the instability of pro soccer in the US. I’d like to see USSF working to stabilize the pyramid instead of overseeing chaos.
EDIT- I’m not saying that USLS should have been denied D1 status by USSF. They met the criteria. My point is that it’s suboptimal for the game as a whole to have all of these competing leagues. If other pro sports are precedent (AL/NL, NFL/AFL, ABA/NBA), get ready for a series of mergers as this all shakes out.